Connect with us

Docking

Web-based tools for protein-peptide docking

Published

on

Protein-protein interactions are considered necessary in interactome analysis as they play an important in various biological processes such as post-translational modifications and signal transduction, and short peptides mediate around 40% of protein-protein interactions[1]. They are also found involved in some kinds of infections and critical human diseases such as cancer [2,3].

Given the importance of protein-peptide interactions, it is necessary to determine their structure complexes to understand the involved mechanisms and then study further for their applications in the development of personalized drugs [4]. Protein-peptide docking methods are categorized into three: local docking, global docking, and template-based docking (for reading in detail, click here). 

This article explains some of the widely used web-based tools for protein-peptide docking.

1. CABS-dock [5]

It is a global protein-peptide docking webserver without a priori information about the binding sites. It searches for the binding sites with random protein conformations and positions of the peptide [5]. It follows four significant steps: first, it generates random structures of the peptide, second, it simulates the binding and docking models using Replica Exchange Monte Carlo dynamics producing 10 trajectories for 10 replicas with each consisting of 1000 time-stamped simulation snapshots; the third step, final models are selected on the basis of initial-filtering during which all unbound models are discarded and 100 models showing lowest energy are selected, followed by k-medoids clustering performed 100 times giving 10 models; finally, these 10 models are reconstructed and optimized using Modeller [6].

The web server (http://biocomp.chem.uw.edu.pl/CABSdock/) offers various options for users. They can either upload the PDB structure of the protein or provide the PDB code along with the peptide sequence or structure and set the simulation cycles.

2. Rosetta FlexPepDock [7]

It is a local protein-peptide docking-based tool that refines protein-peptide complex structures using the Monte Carlo minimization approach. The input structures of both the protein and the peptide undergo optimization during which side-chain conformers are optimized to reduce internal clashes of the structures. Later, a refinement step is followed to provide one single model, during which reduced repulsive Van der Waals terms and increased attractive Van der Waals terms are optimized in 10 cycles.

The web server (http://flexpepdock.furmanlab.cs.huji.ac.il/cite.phpoffers various advanced options such as constraint file upload, reference structure, and so forth [7].

3. GalaxyPepDock [8]

This is a template-based docking method that uses known structures as templates to generate a protein-peptide complex. It involves two major steps: template selection and model building. In the first step, the templates are searched in the PepBind database [9] on the basis of interaction and structure similarity calculating a Scomplex score for each complex. In the second step, 50 complex models are built using GalaxyTBM [10], which undergo optimization, and ultimately, 10 complex structures are selected depending on the best energy values and are further processed using the GalaxyRefine method [11] which adjusts the side-chains and backbone using molecular dynamics.

The web server (http://galaxy.seoklab.org/cgi-bin/submit.cgi?type=PEPDOCK) is also user-friendly and also provides a stand-alone version.

4. pepATTRACT [12]

This is a completely global protein-peptide docking method for blind and large-scale docking. It follows two major steps: protein-peptide docking; and interface analysis and prediction. During the first step, three model structures are generated using PeptideBuilder [13] followed by filling missing atoms using PDB2PQR [14]. These structures are later converted into ATTRACT coarse-grained atom-type representation [15] followed by docking using ATTRACT [15]. The  50 docked models are selected for each of which interface propensity is calculated and finally presented to the user.

The web server (http://bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/services/pepATTRACT/) requires the input of simple protein and peptide structures/sequences.


References

  1. Petsalaki, E., & Russell, R. B. (2008). Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. Current opinion in biotechnology19(4), 344-350.
  2. Soni, V., Cahir-McFarland, E., & Kieff, E. (2007). LMP1 TRAFficking activates growth and survival pathways. In TNF Receptor Associated Factors (TRAFs) (pp. 173-187). Springer, New York, NY.
  3. MacLaine, N. J., & Hupp, T. R. (2011). How phosphorylation controls p53. Cell Cycle10(6), 916-921.
  4. Craik, D. J., Fairlie, D. P., Liras, S., & Price, D. (2013). The future of peptide‐based drugs. Chemical biology & drug design81(1), 136-147.
  5. Eswar, N., Webb, B., Marti‐Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M. Y., … & Sali, A. (2006). Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller. Current protocols in bioinformatics15(1), 5-6.
  6. Eswar, N., Webb, B., Marti‐Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M. Y., … & Sali, A. (2006). Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller. Current protocols in bioinformatics15(1), 5-6.
  7. London, N., Raveh, B., Cohen, E., Fathi, G., & Schueler-Furman, O. (2011). Rosetta FlexPepDock web server—high resolution modeling of peptide–protein interactions. Nucleic acids research39(suppl_2), W249-W253.
  8. Lee, H., Heo, L., Lee, M. S., & Seok, C. (2015). GalaxyPepDock: a protein–peptide docking tool based on interaction similarity and energy optimization. Nucleic acids research43(W1), W431-W435.
  9. Das, A. A., Sharma, O. P., Kumar, M. S., Krishna, R., & Mathur, P. P. (2013). PepBind: a comprehensive database and computational tool for analysis of protein–peptide interactions. Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics11(4), 241-246.
  10. Ko, J., Park, H., & Seok, C. (2012). GalaxyTBM: template-based modeling by building a reliable core and refining unreliable local regions. BMC bioinformatics13(1), 198.
  11. Heo, L., Park, H., & Seok, C. (2013). GalaxyRefine: protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic acids research41(W1), W384-W388.
  12. de Vries, S. J., Rey, J., Schindler, C. E., Zacharias, M., & Tuffery, P. (2017). The pepATTRACT web server for blind, large-scale peptide–protein docking. Nucleic acids research45(W1), W361-W364.
  13. Tien, M. Z., Sydykova, D. K., Meyer, A. G., & Wilke, C. O. (2013). PeptideBuilder: A simple Python library to generate model peptides. PeerJ1, e80.
  14. Dolinsky, T. J., Nielsen, J. E., McCammon, J. A., & Baker, N. A. (2004). PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson–Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic acids research32(suppl_2), W665-W667.
  15. Zacharias, M. (2003). Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side‐chain flexibility. Protein Science12(6), 1271-1282.

Tariq is founder of Bioinformatics Review and CEO at IQL Technologies. His areas of expertise include algorithm design, phylogenetics, MicroArray, Plant Systematics, and genome data analysis. If you have questions, reach out to him via his homepage.

Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Bioinformatics News

VS_Analysis: A Python package to perform post-virtual screening analysis

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

VS_Analysis: A Python package to perform post-virtual screening analysis

Virtual screening (VS) is a crucial aspect of bioinformatics. As you may already know, there are various tools available for this purpose, including both paid and freely accessible options such as Autodock Vina. Conducting virtual screening with Autodock Vina requires less effort than analyzing its results. However, the analysis process can be challenging due to the large number of output files generated. To address this, we offer a comprehensive Python package designed to automate the analysis of virtual screening results.

(more…)

Continue Reading

Bioinformatics Programming

vs_interaction_analysis.py: Python script to perform post-virtual screening analysis

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

vs_interaction_analysis.py: Python script to perform post-virtual screening analysis

Analyzing the results of virtual screening (VS) performed with Autodock Vina [1] can be challenging when done manually. In earlier instances, we supplied two scripts, namely vs_analysis.py [2,3] and vs_analysis_compounds.py [4]. This time, we have developed a new Python script to simplify the analysis of VS results.

(more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

[Tutorial] Performing docking using DockingPie plugin in PyMOL.

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

[Tutorial] Performing docking using DockingPie plugin in PyMOL.

DockingPie [1] is a PyMOL plugin to perform computational docking within PyMOL [2]. In this article, we will perform simple docking using DockingPie1.2.

(more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to install the DockingPie plugin on PyMOL?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to install DockingPie plugin on PyMOL?

DockingPie [1] is a plugin of PyMOL [2] made to fulfill the purpose of docking within the PyMOL interface. This plugin will allow you to dock using four different algorithms, namely, Vina, RxDock, SMINA, and ADFR. It will also allow you to perform flexible docking. Though the installation procedure is the same for all OSs, in this article, we are installing this plugin on Ubuntu (Linux).

(more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

[Tutorial] Installing Pyrx on Windows.

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

[Tutorial] Installing Pyrx on Windows.

Pyrx [1] is another virtual screening software that also offers to perform docking using Autodock Vina. In this article, we will install Pyrx on Windows. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to install Autodock4 on Ubuntu?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to install Autodock4 on Ubuntu?

Autodock suite is used for docking small molecules [1]. Recently, Autodock-GPU [2] is developed to accelerate the docking process. Its installation is described in this article. In this tutorial, we will install Autodock 4.2.6 on Ubuntu.

(more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

What values are considered as good or bad in computational docking?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

After performing computational docking, a question that comes to mind most is “what docking score is considered good or bad”. In this article, we will discuss this in detail. (more…)

Continue Reading

Bioinformatics Programming

How to sort binding affinities based on a cutoff using vs_analysis.py script?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to sort binding affinities based on a cutoff using vs_analysis.py script?

Previously, we have provided a Python script (vs_analysis.py) to analyze the virtual screening (VS) results of Autodock Vina. Now, we have updated this script to sort binding affinities based on user inputted cutoff value. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

Virtual Screening using Autodock Vina: Frequently Asked Questions & Answers for Starters

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

Virtual Screening using Autodock Vina: Virtual Screening: Frequently Asked Questions & Answers for Starters

Virtual Screening (VS) is one of the important techniques in bioinformatics. It can be easily performed using Autodock Vina. We have provided detailed articles on this topic. In this article, we are trying to answer some FAQs for beginners. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

[Tutorial] How to perform docking of zinc metalloproteins using Autodock Vina?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

[Tutorial] How to perform docking of zinc metalloproteins using Autodock Vina?

Proteins containing zinc atoms are docked in a different way than that of the normal simple proteins. Zinc atoms must be considered by a force field during the docking process. In this article, we are going to dock zinc metalloprotein with a ligand using Autodock Vina [1]. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to generate config file for docking using Autodock Tools?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to generate config file for docking using Autodock Tools?

A configuration file is one of the required files for docking using Autodock Vina. In this article, we are going to generate a config file using Autodock Tools GUI [1]. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to install Autodock on Ubuntu (Linux) with CUDA GPU support?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to install Autodock on Ubuntu (Linux) with CUDA GPU support?

Autodock [1] is most widely used for docking. To accelerate the docking process, especially, during virtual screening, Autodock-GPU [2] provides great help. In this article, we are going to install Autodock-GPU on Ubuntu. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

Autodock Vina: Uses & Applications

Published

on

Autodock Vina: Uses & Applications

Autodock Vina [1] is one of the most widely used bioinformatics software for computational docking. For beginners and those who are new to the field of bioinformatics, such software may appear confusing without having an initial idea of what this software actually used for. In this article, we have discussed some of the primary uses and applications of Autodock Vina software. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to perform virtual screening using Pyrx?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to perform virtual screening using Pyrx?

Pyrx is a bioinformatics tool to perform virtual screening [1]. We previously provided an article on performing simple protein-ligand site-specific docking using Pyrx. In this article, we are going to perform virtual screening using Pyrx. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to perform metal ion-protein docking using idock?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to perform metal ion-protein docking using idock?

Previously, we provided a tutorial on the installation of idock on Ubuntu (Linux). In this article, we are going to demonstrate the docking of a metal ion (such as Zn, Mg, Fe, etc.,) with a protein using idock. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to install idock on Ubuntu?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to install idock on Ubuntu?

idock [1] is a multithreaded software based on Autodock Vina. It is a virtual screening tool for flexible ligand docking. It also supports 27 different chemical elements including zinc, magnesium, iron, calcium, etc. In this article, we are going to install idock on Ubuntu. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to analyze HADDOCK results using Pymol script generated from PRODIGY?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to analyze HADDOCK results using Pymol script generated from PRODIGY?

In one of our previously published articles, we demonstrated protein-protein docking using HADDOCK2.4 [1]. In this article, we are going to demonstrate the HADDOCK results analysis using a Pymol script generated from the PRODIGY server [2]. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

Installing PatchDock on Ubuntu (Linux)

Published

on

Installing PatchDock on Ubuntu (Linux)

PatchDock is a docking algorithm that is based on the shape complementarity principle [1,2]. It performs molecular docking of any two types of molecules including proteins, DNA, drugs, and peptides. In this article, we are going to install PatchDock on Ubuntu (Linux). (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

Protein-protein docking using HADDOCK2.4 web server

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

Protein-protein docking using HADDOCK2.4 web server

HADDOCK2.4 web server (https://bianca.science.uu.nl/haddock2.4/) [1] is used for protein-protein docking and their modeling. Not only proteins, but it can also process peptides, small molecules, and nucleic acids. In this article, we are going to perform protein-protein docking. (more…)

Continue Reading

Docking

How to perform site-specific docking using Pyrx?

Dr. Muniba Faiza

Published

on

How to perform site-specific docking using Pyrx?

Pyrx [1] is a virtual screening software that allows the docking of multiple ligands with a target protein. Previously, we provided an article on the installation of Pyrx in Ubuntu. In this article, we are going to perform protein-ligand docking using Pyrx. (more…)

Continue Reading

LATEST ISSUE

ADVERT