Bioinformatics ReviewBioinformatics Review
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  •  Home
  • Docking
  • MD Simulation
  • Tools
  • More Topics
    • Softwares
    • Sequence Analysis
    • Algorithms
    • Bioinformatics Programming
    • Bioinformatics Research Updates
    • Drug Discovery
    • Phylogenetics
    • Structural Bioinformatics
    • Editorials
    • Tips & Tricks
    • Bioinformatics News
    • Featured
    • Genomics
    • Bioinformatics Infographics
  • Community
    • BiR-Research Group
    • Community Q&A
    • Ask a question
    • Join Telegram Channel
    • Join Facebook Group
    • Join Reddit Group
    • Subscription Options
    • Become a Patron
    • Write for us
  • About Us
    • About BiR
    • BiR Scope
    • The Team
    • Guidelines for Research Collaboration
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
    • Recent @ BiR
  • Subscription
  • Account
    • Visit Dashboard
    • Login
Font ResizerAa
Bioinformatics ReviewBioinformatics Review
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Featured

Deciding the right journal for your paper: 5 things to look for

Tariq Abdullah
Last updated: May 20, 2020 5:48 pm
Tariq Abdullah
Share
6 Min Read
Five things to look at when choosing the right journal for your paper
Five things to look at when choosing the right journal for your paper
SHARE

Considering the amount of effort and hard work that goes into writing a research paper, it is critical to choose the right journal to reach the right scientific audience. It is particularly important not to literally waste your valuable work by falling prey to predatory journals. So we came up with this short guide that will make it easier for you to decide where to publish without getting into problems or without getting duped.

Contents
First things first, OA or Not?Beware of predatory journalKnow the scope of the journal you are publishing inImpact (Not Impact Factor)
  1. First things first, OA or Not?

    Some journals are purely Open Access(OA). Every single paper published in such journals are available without any fees or subscribe directly via the internet. Open access journals are good to go. But making science available to the public for free comes with a cost – they charge the authors for the publication charges. This makes them out of reach for an independent researcher or authors without much financial backing. To overcome this, some journals are partly open access and allow the authors to choose whether they want their paper to be open access by paid Open Access Charge. So decide carefully whether you want to go open access. If so, you can search for the journal of your interest on DOAJ(Directory of Open Access Journals).

  2. Beware of predatory journal

    Predatory journals are ‘Fake’ journals that are fraudulently set up to earn some easy cash. These journals attract young researchers by offering close to 100% acceptance rate, namesake/no review. Typically you can know whether a journal is predatory or not by looking into this list or this list (Popularly known as Bealle’s List). Although this is not an absolute list but it may come handy when deciding. You can identify a predatory journal by looking at the general signs such as lack of contact/office address on the website(or having just an email address as contact information). Not mentioning phone number of editors, missing details of the editorial board etc.

  3. Does your journal participate in archiving programs?
    What if the website goes down tomorrow? or maybe the journal goes bankrupt? What will happen to the valuable research that was published in it? The good news is that the most journals participate in an archiving program where they deposit data for permanent storage, i.e. even if the journal shuts down, your paper will not cease to exist. This is done by providing each article with a DOI(digital object identifier) number which is unique and points to the same article, forever. Okay, so what if the data center gets nuked? or maybe what if the data center where all the DOI are stored suddenly catch fire? To prevent such scenarios, a large number of copies of the same content are kept at different locations around the world. This is achieved by a journal participating in LOCKSS (Large Number of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) program. Some journals participate in NCBI PubMed where they deposit published data. So the next time you choose a journal, better make sure it participates in LOCKSS.
  4. Know the scope of the journal you are publishing in

    The basic aim & essence of publishing research are to reach scientific fraternity, telling them about the significant work that you have done and what it could be used for(Although there are people who publish to merely gain credits). So better reach the right audience, by selecting a journal whose readership and editorial board comprises of people in a related field. The aims and scopes of the journal should match with your work. For example, the Journal of Theoretical Biology is aimed at theoretical studies and it will not accept your wet lab research work. Furthermore, the areas outlined in the journal’s homepage are the ones that will be accepted. Articles falling out of scope are usually rejected thus the loss of precious time.

  5. Impact (Not Impact Factor)

    Ask yourself whether the contents of the journal are accessible via search. Make sure you are able to search the articles published in your selected journal via Google Scholar, PubMed or PubMed Central. You can also consider Impact Factor (by Thomson Reuters) of a journal while deciding buy, try not to overemphasize it. IF is a measure of others work and does not mean it will put any weight to your research. A journal with a good impact factor is likely to be having more readership and thus, citations. You should target a journal that not only publishes your research but also takes strides in publicizing it. What is the point of publishing in a journal that does not really publishes your research?

Final Words

It is wise to use caution while selecting a journal. It will save you time, money and your efforts that may otherwise go into vain. Emphasizing on these five points may be time taking, but in the end, it pays off to be more cautious.

Liked this article? Why not share the URL of this article with a friend and save their day?

Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByTariq Abdullah
Tariq is founder of Bioinformatics Review and Lead Developer at IQL Technologies. His areas of expertise include algorithm design, phylogenetics, MicroArray, Plant Systematics, and genome data analysis. If you have questions, reach out to him via his homepage.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Starting in Bioinformatics? Do This First!
Starting in Bioinformatics? Do This First!
Tips & Tricks
[Editorial] Is it ethical to change the order of authors’ names in a manuscript?
Editorial Opinion
Installing bbtools on Ubuntu
[Tutorial] Installing BBTools on Ubuntu (Linux).
Sequence Analysis Software Tools
wes_data_analysis Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) Data visualization Toolkit
wes_data_analysis: Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) Data visualization Toolkit
Bioinformatics Programming GitHub Python

You Might Also Like

BiR: Impact report – July 2016 & More

October 4, 2018
FeaturedMetabolomics

Chemometrics in Metabolomics (Part-I):Overview of Biomarker Discovery

June 12, 2020
Featured

Genome editing of human embryos using CRISPR/Cas9- crossing the ethics of gene editing?

May 20, 2020
DockingFeaturedVideo Tutorial

Video Tutorial: Autodock Vina Result Analysis with PyMol

November 23, 2024
Copyright 2024 IQL Technologies
  • Journal
  • Customer Support
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?

Not a member? Sign Up